🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 stands as arguably the most fatal – and consequential – days throughout three decades of unrest in the region.

In the streets where events unfolded – the images of Bloody Sunday are visible on the walls and seared in public consciousness.

A public gathering was conducted on a cold but bright afternoon in the city.

The demonstration was opposing the policy of internment – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been put in place after three years of conflict.

Troops from the specialized division killed thirteen individuals in the Bogside area – which was, and remains, a strongly republican community.

A specific visual became particularly memorable.

Images showed a Catholic priest, Father Daly, using a bloodied white handkerchief as he tried to defend a crowd moving a young man, Jackie Duddy, who had been fatally wounded.

Media personnel recorded much footage on the day.

Historical records features Fr Daly informing a media representative that troops "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

This account of what happened wasn't accepted by the initial investigation.

The initial inquiry found the soldiers had been shot at first.

During the peace process, the administration commissioned another inquiry, following pressure by bereaved relatives, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

In 2010, the report by the investigation said that on balance, the military personnel had fired first and that none of the individuals had posed any threat.

The then government leader, the Prime Minister, apologised in the government chamber – stating killings were "improper and inexcusable."

The police started to look into the incident.

A military veteran, referred to as the defendant, was brought to trial for killing.

He was charged regarding the killings of one victim, 22, and in his mid-twenties another victim.

The defendant was additionally charged of attempting to murder several people, other civilians, Joe Mahon, Michael Quinn, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a judicial decision preserving the soldier's privacy, which his lawyers have argued is essential because he is at threat.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had only fired at people who were carrying weapons.

That claim was rejected in the official findings.

Evidence from the examination was unable to be used straightforwardly as proof in the court case.

In the dock, the accused was shielded from sight using a protective barrier.

He made statements for the initial occasion in the hearing at a proceeding in that month, to answer "not responsible" when the accusations were read.

Family members of the deceased on the incident journeyed from Londonderry to the judicial building every day of the proceedings.

A family member, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they were aware that hearing the case would be painful.

"I visualize the events in my memory," he said, as we examined the key areas mentioned in the proceedings – from the location, where Michael was shot dead, to the adjacent the courtyard, where James Wray and another victim were died.

"It returns me to my position that day.

"I assisted with my brother and place him in the medical transport.

"I relived each detail during the proceedings.

"Notwithstanding experiencing the process – it's still valuable for me."